The SFI's JNU unit is disbanded!!!!
I recall an evening at the Sutlej Hostel mess in JNU way
back in 1985. At a general body meeting of the SFI, for which the then all
India president, Nepal Dev Bhattacharya had come, an innocuous question by one
of our comrades led up to a long debate. Nepal Dev had made a point that the
SFI is not a wing or an affiliate of the CPI(M). And that it is an autonomous
organisation.
I think it was Sanjay Nayak who insisted that this point be
debated. He recalled instances where the SFI behaved another way. And Nepal Deo
simply pulled out the SFI programme to tell us all that the autonomous nature
of the organisation was clearly stated in that. And thus began a debate that
went on for more than a couple of hours. It was hilarious sometimes and
acrimonious some other time. For me, having been part of the SFI in Tamil Nadu,
where there was no such pretension, all that was said by the all India
president sounded absurd. In Tamil Nadu, we functioned out of the CPI(M)’s
premises and even used to deposit the organisation’s funds with the secretary
in the party office. One of the party’s leaders in the district was also a
permanent invitee in our meetings; let me add that he steered the meetings.
In any case, I was just past my teens then. And the
adolescent in me provoked me to do some mischief. I just pulled out a piece of
paper and wrote a resolution that the SFI, JNU unit, resolves that Comrade
Nepaldev Bhattacharya, shall henceforth resign from the CPI(M) and that his
association with the CPI(M) as a member of the West Bengal State Committee was
found as affecting his autonomy and hindered the functioning of the SFI of
which he was the all India president. I was too young then to realise that the
resolution belonged to the same league as the one raised by Madhu Limaye in the
Janata Party.
I do recall now that Nepaldev, a simple man that he was, was
taken aback and the SFI JNU unit leaders were angry. The resolution was passed
by a majority and in a matter of minutes, the little leaders around found a way
out. They said that Nepaldev belonged to the SFI across the country and that
one unit cannot dictate his own decision to be part of the CPI(M) and that the
resolution, even if passed, was not binding unless it was taken up at the SFI
all India conference. I must add here that Nepaldev was expelled from the
CPI(M) some year later. And he was also too old by then and had been relieved
from the SFI too.
I reiterate now that all that I did that evening was just
mischief. I knew even then that the CPI(M) steered the SFI as it did with the
CITU, DYFI, AIDWA, AIKS and the various other such outfits. I had no issues
with that even then. Used to get irritated at times when some leaders in the
party thought they must control the organisation even in its day to day
affairs. It was a fact that those from Vithalbhai Patel House, where the SFI
headquarters was located used to insist on being present in the various
meetings and general bodies of the SFI in JNU. And there was one Comrade
Joginder Singh, as secretary of the Delhi State CPI(M) who thought we were all little kids to be
minded and mended.
I recall all these after reading the news that the SFI’s JNU
unit has been disbanded. And this was done because the unit resolved to condemn
the CPI(M) for supporting Pranab Mukherjee for President. I do see the
influence of Prasenjit Bose in the JNU unit so strong. But should the unit have
been disbanded for opposing the party? Well. I was asked to show cause once for
having made a critical remark against Subhashini Ali’s lecture on Kashmir in a
public meeting in JNU. I simply said then that her speech on Kashmir sounded like
an address by L.K.Advani. Yes. I thought she went jingoistic and said that. I
was taken to task then and the little leaders of the SFI in JNU did that.
2 Comments:
After Tianenmen incidents in China in 1989 when there was widespread anger against ruthless use of force on students, SFI JNU unit waited to react till the CPI(M) took a view. And lifted the sentences of CPI(M) politbureau's statement to begin its leaflet in the campus. It is sheer hypocrisy on the part of party leaders to say that the mass organisations are autonomous. It is interesting to see the JNU unit of SFI reacted the way it did regarding the party's support to Pranab Mukherjee. Probably the JNU unit, getting defeated regularly in student elections, is under pressure to prove its anti-cong credentials to salvage some image on the campus.
I remember one C Ramachandriah, in JNU. I also remember him and his organisation leaning on the SFI JNU unit for a few council seats and the position of JNUSU general secretary even after 1989.. I mean even after Tianenmen Square massacre. I suppose this is not the same Ramachandriah!!!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home